为什么美国人反对英国人殖民

如题。 详细,最好是英文的
我用来做英文演讲的。 State ine defining characteristic of American hestory/society. Make sure you state your definition clearly...okay?

国人开始在北美大西洋沿岸建立殖民地.一百多年后英国在北美的殖民地以有13个。
英国政府为了增加财政权入,不断增加殖民地的税收,对殖民地进行蛮横的压榨和残酷的剥削
英国人又想出个新花样:印花税。他们规定,一切公文、契约合同,执照、报纸、杂志、广告、单据、遗嘱,都必须贴上印花税票,才能生效可流通。这激起殖民地人民极大的愤怒,于是,“自由之子”、“通讯委员会”等秘密反英组织相继出现,各地都发生了反英事件,抵制英货、赶走税吏、焚烧税票、武装反抗等等。这一切引起了英国政府的恐慌,他们立即派军队镇压。1770年3月5日,英军在波士顿向手无寸铁的市民开枪,当场打死5名市民,打伤了6人,制造了震惊北美的“波士顿惨案”。反英的怒火在殖民地人民心中燃烧,一场争取独立和自由的战火即将在北美大陆上燃烧起来了。事件到此告一段落。

这些都是找的
你也可以找找
波士顿倾茶事件
莱克星顿的枪声

《独立宣言》
就这些吧
祝你演讲成功哦

我英文不好就中文吧
温馨提示:答案为网友推荐,仅供参考
第1个回答  2009-09-23
以下是从国外网站上复制过来的,原文在BBC网站的“History”板块有,不知道对楼主是否有用。

The origins of the American War of Independence

Problems for Britain had existed in America from the start of colonisation. The first settlers were escapees from religious and social persecution - Quakers, Baptists and so on. These people are epitomised by the Pilgrim Fathers. The early settlers were free-thinking, independent, rugged, hardy and individualistic. Human factors were far more important than geographic factors as a cause of the final split from Britain.

Although there was little communication between England and America, the same was true of other colonies such as India, the West Indies and Canada (after 1763). However the other colonies had had autocratic rule before Britain took control: things remained the same but with a different ruler.

There had been little British intervention in America from 1621 until 1756. This 150 year period is known as one of 'salutary neglect'. Other than the operation of the Navigation Acts to regulate trade, Britain allowed the colonies to go their own way. Pitt the Elder began the first large-scale intervention during the Seven Years' War, ending the virtual independence of the thirteen colonies.

By 1760 the British controlled the eastern seaboard of America. The colonies were:

1. THE NEW ENGLAND COLONIES:
Massachusetts
New Hampshire
Connecticut
Rhode Island

2. THE MIDDLE COLONIES
New York
Pennsylvania
New Jersey
Delaware
Maryland

3. THE SOUTHERN COLONIES
Virginia
North Carolina
South Carolina
Georgia

In America, only partial British rule applied. Each of the thirteen separate colonies had a Governor appointed by the Crown. He was responsible only for trade and defence. The daily administration - by - laws, internal taxation and so on - was in the hands of local, very democratically elected colonial assemblies. Each of these had two Houses: the Assembly (the colonial equivalent to the House of Commons) and Council (the equivalent to the House of Lords). The Council was made up of important persons in each colony.

The colonists thought of themselves as Englishmen, with the rights of Englishmen as set out in the Bill of Rights of 1689. Politically, the colonists were highly developed. Given the conditions in existence, national independence was highly likely once the idea of independence matured. The seed was already there: the American Revolution was only evolution.

A break with the mother country became imminent when democratic radicals, who were products of the self-governing colonies, emerged with the idea of continental independence. Leaders of the independence movement included Samuel Adams, Benjamin Franklin, James Otis and Thomas Jefferson.

The New England colonies and Virginia led the movement towards independence because:

1. they were the oldest and most independent colonies
2. they owed more money in Britain
3. they were hit the hardest by the new legislation after 1763
4. they organised themselves to oppose British rule

A. Early Developments

After about 1700, the conflict between French and English settlers in North America became endemic. The French had built a series of forts down the Ohio-Mississippi river complex that prevented the westward movement of English settlers from the seaboard colonies to the interior of the continent.

In 1754, George Washington failed to capture Fort Duquesne from the French but his failure exacerbated already strained Anglo-French relations that degenerated into the French and Indian War - which in 1756 became part of the Seven Years' War. Britain decided that she was obliged to protect America to defend British trade and prestige. British troops were sent to America and the colonists were required to raise money to support them. The colonists also were expected to provide militiamen to fight the French. Pitt promised to repay the colonies at the end of the war for all the money they raised. There was friction between Britain and the colonies during the Seven Years' War over several issues:

1. Writs of Assistance which empowered customs officials to enter and search warehouses, stores and homes 'on suspicion' of smuggled goods being there. Smuggling was rife: the colonists continued to trade with the French in the West Indies during the war. The money earned by the French allowed them to continue fighting. In 1760 British customs officials tried to enforce the 1733 Molasses Act by implementing Writs of Assistance. The Writ had to be renewed in 1760 on the death of George II. James Otis, a barrister, challenged the legality of Writs of Assistance. Although the Writ was renewed, Otis' action was tantamount to challenging the supremacy of parliament to control colonial trade.

2. the Virginia 2d Act 1758. This regulated the price of Virginia tobacco at 2d per lb. although it was worth 6d on the open market. However, the Virginia planters were heavily in debt and creditors demanded payment in tobacco at the value of only 2d per lb. This left the planters with little tobacco to sell at the market value and also meant that their debts diminished only slowly.
3. colonial paper currency and inflation caused difficulties. Paper money was issued in anticipation of taxes and the British refunds for the war effort being paid to the colonies. Colonial money devalued which upset British creditors and merchants since the colonial merchants tried to pay their debts in colonial currency. £150 colonial was worth only £100 sterling but attempts by the British to fix an exchange rate met with opposition.

B. 1763 Peace of Paris

The British victory in North America had been overwhelming.

1. the French had been defeated in Canada and their forts on the Ohio-Mississippi had been captured
2. Pontiac's rebellion against the English was defeated. The Indian threat to the colonists was removed in 1763, so far as the French alliance was concerned. The Indians generally had supported the French in the Seven Years' War because the French treated them much more fairly than the British and/or American colonists.

The British victory of 1763 led to further problems and grievances. As a result of the lack of co-operation from the colonists in the Seven Years' War a new policy for the American colonies had been formulated over a period of years by Britain. This was to be implemented at the end of the war. The new policy was aimed at ending salutary neglect and at attaining better control over the colonies. The policy was formulated by Bute but was implemented by Grenville.

C. Boston 'Massacre' & Boston 'tea-party'

In part the deterioration of relations between Britain and her American colonies - which eventually led to the War of Independence - stemmed from a logical British attempt to make the colonies contribute more to the cost of their own defence. It was also partly the result of the desire of some successful merchants in the colonies to break free of controls imposed by the pro-British elite, and from British political miscalculations that saw foreign policy oscillate between harshness and surrender. Another factor was the work of radical politicians and propagandists - such as Sam Adams and Paul Revere - who envisaged a break with Britain when many of their countrymen still hoped that it might be avoided.

The descent into armed conflict between patriot (anti-British) and loyalist (pro-British) sympathisers was gradual. Events like the Boston 'Massacre' of 1770, when British troops fired on a mob that had attacked a British sentry outside Boston's State House, and the Boston 'tea-party' of 1773, when British-taxed tea was thrown into the harbour, marked the downward steps. Less obvious was the take-over of the colonial militias - which had initially been formed to provide local defence against the French and the Native Americans - by officers in sympathy the the American patrios/rebels, rather than by those in sympathy with pro-British loyalists/Tories.

As all these elements of conflict came into play, the British commander in chief in North America was Lieutenant General Thomas Gage. He had long experience of the American continent, and had a beautiful and intelligent American wife, but he was under pressure from London to lance what seemed to be a painful boil.
相似回答